TCA 37-1-411
Evidentiary privileges not applicable to child abuse cases
PENDINGUnknown
What does this charge mean?
This statute removes certain privacy protections in child abuse cases. Normally, conversations between a husband and wife, a patient and psychiatrist, or a patient and psychologist are confidential and cannot be used as evidence in court; however, this statute says those privacy protections do NOT apply when evidence is needed to prove that a child has been harmed or neglected. This means private conversations can be shared in court if they help protect a child from abuse.
Penalty Details
ClassificationUnknown
Penalty SummaryClassification not specified
Neither the husband-wife privilege as preserved in § 24-1-201, nor the psychiatrist-patient privilege as set forth in § 24-1-207, nor the psychologist-patient privilege as set forth in § 63-11-213 is a ground for excluding evidence regarding harm or the cause of harm to a child in any dependency and neglect proceeding resulting from a report of such harm under § 37-1-403 or a criminal prosecution for severe child abuse.
View on official sourceLast verified: Feb 25, 2026
Quick Facts
PENDING
TCA Section37-1-411